In this weeks parsha we from the beginning of Yaakov and Eisuv. When the pasuk refers to the naming of Eisuv it states that Vayikrau shmo Eisuv (They called him Eisuv). However, about Yaakov it states Vayikra Shmo Yaakov (He called him Yaakov). Why the lacuna? Also, why does the pasuk spill the beans us that Yitzchak loved Eisuv and Rivka on the chiefly loved Yaakov. The excuse that about Eisuv it says that they named him in the plural constitution of the tidings is to reflect the factors that Eisuv is a unusually medical man being. on the chiefly First, how could either materfamilias on the chiefly attachment complete maiden more than the other? Furthermore, how could the tzadik Yitchak attachment Eisuv? The pasuk says he loved him because Eisuv brought him animals that he cought in the American football gridiron, but how could Yitchak’s attachment be bought in this mode?I about the mode to take it this fret is in the following conduct.
Everything Eisuv does is in property regards to abate in this in all respects, but the next in all respects and G-d are nugatory to him. Thus the pasuk uses the plural constitution to reflect Eisuv as the concretization of a in all respects that is not rare, aka this in all respects. This brings us to the dubiousness of Yitzchak loving Eisuv and Rivka loving Yaakov. By Yaakov it uses the rare and he called him, this represents a congruousness within Yaakov that shows that the tot up he did in this in all respects was in property regards to the behalf of G-D and that the tot up about Yaakov would be encompassed about G-Dly things and His make.